Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-organized reference with concrete IDs, templates, and JQL. It loses points for some conceptual AC padding and the lack of explicit validation/verification steps in the issue-creation workflow.
Suggestions
Trim or condense the 'Writing Good Acceptance Criteria' section to the format-specific essentials, dropping general AC-vs-DoD philosophy Claude already knows.
Add an explicit verification step after issue creation (e.g. a JQL check that the issue exists with the expected sprint/parent) to close the workflow loop.
Make the create-issue sequence explicit as a numbered workflow rather than leaving it implied across sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient — concrete ID tables, ADF templates, and a gotchas list — but the 'Writing Good Acceptance Criteria' section explains general AC-vs-DoD product-management concepts Claude already knows, which could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: exact field IDs, copy-paste ADF JSON templates, ready-to-run JQL queries, and precise error messages for each gotcha. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequencing is implicit (look up sprint → format ADF → create issue) but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops to verify a created issue, so it stays at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file (no bundle dirs exist) organized into clear, navigable sections — appropriate for a reference skill that needs no external references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |