Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a dense, actionable, well-organized changelog-generation playbook with strong conciseness and an explicit reviewer-gate validation loop appropriate to its batch PR-writing workflow; its only real gap is that the procedure is implied through bullets rather than an explicit numbered sequence.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a terse, imperative bullet list with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line carries an actionable rule or command, so it earns the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, executable guidance such as `rg -C2 -i '<term>' lang/po/{lang}.po | head`, `gh api`, the `<video controls src="URL" title="CAPTION"></video>` form, and a before/after table example, but several bullets are rule-based constraints (glossary traps, ordering rules) rather than copy-paste-ready commands, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence is implied (parse refs, crawl/rank, write per-language docs, gate with reviewer, PR) and it includes an explicit validation feedback loop (MUST run reviewer, fix every valid issue, rerun or document why findings are not applied), which clears the batch-operation cap; it stops at 4 because the steps are implied via bullets rather than a numbered sequence with every checkpoint. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and has no bundle files to defer to; per the simple-skills scoring note it qualifies for the top anchor with well-organized sections (## Example command, ## Before/after example) and a single one-level external example reference. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |