CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

team-brainstorm

Unified team skill for brainstorming team. Uses team-worker agent architecture with role directories for domain logic. Coordinator orchestrates pipeline, workers are team-worker agents. Triggers on "team brainstorm".

45

Quality

47%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/team-brainstorm/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured orchestration skill that effectively serves as a router and reference hub for a multi-agent brainstorming system. Its strengths are strong actionability with concrete spawn templates and clear progressive disclosure via role delegation. Weaknesses include some verbosity in the spawn templates (two near-identical blocks) and a lack of explicit validation checkpoints between pipeline stages, which is important for a multi-step orchestration workflow.

Suggestions

Consolidate the two Worker Spawn Templates into one with a note about the parallel ideator variant differences (agent_name field, naming convention) to reduce token usage.

Add explicit validation/checkpoint steps between pipeline stages (e.g., 'Verify ideator outputs exist before spawning challenger') to improve workflow clarity for this multi-step orchestration process.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is reasonably efficient and avoids explaining basic concepts, but the Worker Spawn Template section is quite verbose with two large code blocks that are very similar (the parallel ideator spawn is nearly identical to the standard spawn). Some consolidation would save tokens.

2 / 3

Actionability

The skill provides concrete, executable Agent spawn templates, specific CLI commands, exact file paths, message bus function signatures, and detailed directory structures. The role router logic is explicit with clear conditional branching.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The overall pipeline flow (generate → challenge → synthesize → evaluate) is clear, and the architecture diagram shows the dispatch pattern. However, there are no explicit validation checkpoints between pipeline stages, no feedback loops for verifying worker output quality before advancing, and the error handling table lists resolutions but doesn't integrate them into the workflow sequence.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill acts as a clear router/overview, with role-specific logic properly delegated to individual role.md files via a well-organized Role Registry table. References are one level deep, clearly signaled with relative paths, and the specs reference points to pipeline definitions separately.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

22%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This description focuses almost entirely on internal architecture (agent patterns, role directories, coordinator/worker structure) rather than describing what the skill does for the user. It lacks concrete actions, meaningful trigger terms beyond 'team brainstorm', and fails to explain when Claude should select this skill. The description reads more like an implementation note than a skill description.

Suggestions

Replace architectural jargon with concrete user-facing actions, e.g., 'Facilitates structured brainstorming sessions by generating ideas, organizing themes, and evaluating proposals across multiple domains.'

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger variations, e.g., 'Use when the user asks to brainstorm, generate ideas, run an ideation session, or explore creative solutions as a team.'

Remove implementation details like 'team-worker agent architecture', 'role directories', and 'coordinator orchestrates pipeline' — these are irrelevant for skill selection and add noise.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description uses vague, abstract language like 'unified team skill' and 'domain logic' without listing any concrete actions the skill performs. It describes architecture ('team-worker agent architecture', 'coordinator orchestrates pipeline') rather than what the skill actually does for the user.

1 / 3

Completeness

The 'what' is extremely weak — it never explains what the skill actually does for the user beyond vague architectural descriptions. While it has a minimal 'when' via 'Triggers on team brainstorm', the lack of a meaningful 'what' makes the description fundamentally incomplete.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

It includes the trigger phrase 'team brainstorm' which is somewhat natural, but lacks common variations users might say such as 'brainstorming session', 'generate ideas', 'ideation', or 'brainstorm ideas'. The term 'brainstorming team' in the first sentence adds slight coverage but is not framed as a trigger.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The specific trigger 'team brainstorm' provides some distinctiveness, but the description's vague framing around 'unified team skill' and 'domain logic' could overlap with other team collaboration or brainstorming skills. The architectural jargon doesn't help differentiate the skill's purpose.

2 / 3

Total

6

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.