CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

team-designer

Meta-skill for generating team skills following the v4 architecture pattern. Produces complete skill packages with SKILL.md router, coordinator, worker roles, specs, and templates. Triggers on "team-designer", "design team".

57

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.codex/skills/team-designer/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Team Skill Designer

Generate complete team skills following the team-lifecycle-v4 architecture: SKILL.md as universal router, coordinator with beat model, worker roles with optional commands/, shared specs, and templates.

Architecture Overview

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  Team Skill Designer (SKILL.md)                                  │
│  → Orchestrator: gather requirements, generate files, validate   │
└───────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────┘
                            │
    ┌───────────┬───────────┼───────────┬───────────┐
    ↓           ↓           ↓           ↓
┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐
│ Phase 1 │ │ Phase 2 │ │ Phase 3 │ │ Phase 4 │
│ Require │ │ Scaffold│ │ Content │ │ Valid   │
│ Analysis│ │  Gen    │ │  Gen    │ │ & Report│
└─────────┘ └─────────┘ └─────────┘ └─────────┘
     ↓           ↓           ↓           ↓
  teamConfig  SKILL.md    roles/      Validated
              + dirs     specs/       skill pkg
                         templates/

Key Design Principles

  1. v4 Architecture Compliance: Generated skills follow team-lifecycle-v4 pattern — SKILL.md = pure router, beat model = coordinator-only, unified structure (roles/ + specs/ + templates/)
  2. Golden Sample Reference: Uses team-lifecycle-v4 as reference implementation at ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/
  3. Intelligent Commands Distribution: Auto-determines which roles need commands/ (2+ commands) vs inline logic (1 command)
  4. team-worker Compatibility: Role.md files include correct YAML frontmatter for team-worker agent parsing

Execution Flow

Progress Tracking Initialization:
   └─ functions.update_plan([all 4 phases, Phase 1 as in_progress])

Input Parsing:
   └─ Parse user requirements (skill name, roles, pipelines, domain)

Phase 1: Requirements Analysis
   └─ Ref: phases/01-requirements-analysis.md
      ├─ Tasks: Detect input → Gather roles → Define pipelines → Build teamConfig
      └─ Output: teamConfig
      └─ Progress: mark phase-1 completed, phase-2 in_progress

Phase 2: Scaffold Generation
   └─ Ref: phases/02-scaffold-generation.md
      ├─ Tasks: Create dirs → Generate SKILL.md router → Verify
      └─ Output: SKILL.md + directory structure
      └─ Progress: mark phase-2 completed, phase-3 in_progress

Phase 3: Content Generation
   └─ Ref: phases/03-content-generation.md
      ├─ Tasks: Coordinator → Workers → Specs → Templates
      └─ Output: roles/**/*.md, specs/*.md, templates/*.md
      └─ Progress: mark phase-3 completed, phase-4 in_progress

Phase 4: Validation
   └─ Ref: phases/04-validation.md
      └─ Output: Validation report (PASS/REVIEW/FAIL)
      └─ Progress: mark phase-4 completed

Return:
   └─ Summary with skill location and usage instructions

Phase Reference Documents (read on-demand when phase executes):

PhaseDocumentPurpose
1phases/01-requirements-analysis.mdGather team skill requirements, build teamConfig
2phases/02-scaffold-generation.mdGenerate SKILL.md router and directory structure
3phases/03-content-generation.mdGenerate coordinator, workers, specs, templates
4phases/04-validation.mdValidate structure, references, and consistency

Golden Sample

Generated skills follow the architecture of ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/:

.claude/skills/<skill-name>/
├── SKILL.md                              # Universal router (all roles read)
├── roles/
│   ├── coordinator/
│   │   ├── role.md                       # Orchestrator + beat model + entry router
│   │   └── commands/
│   │       ├── analyze.md                # Task analysis
│   │       ├── dispatch.md               # Task chain creation
│   │       └── monitor.md                # Beat control + callbacks
│   ├── <inline-worker>/
│   │   └── role.md                       # Phase 2-4 embedded (simple role)
│   └── <command-worker>/
│       ├── role.md                       # Phase 2-4 dispatcher
│       └── commands/
│           ├── <cmd-1>.md
│           └── <cmd-2>.md
├── specs/
│   ├── pipelines.md                      # Pipeline definitions + task registry
│   └── <domain-specs>.md                 # Domain-specific specifications
└── templates/                            # Optional document templates

Progress Tracking

Initialize progress tracking before Phase 1 execution:

functions.update_plan([
  { id: "phase-1", title: "Phase 1: Requirements Analysis", status: "in_progress" },
  { id: "phase-2", title: "Phase 2: Scaffold Generation", status: "pending" },
  { id: "phase-3", title: "Phase 3: Content Generation", status: "pending" },
  { id: "phase-4", title: "Phase 4: Validation", status: "pending" }
])

At each phase transition:

  • Phase 1 complete: functions.update_plan([{id: "phase-1", status: "completed"}, {id: "phase-2", status: "in_progress"}])
  • Phase 2 complete: functions.update_plan([{id: "phase-2", status: "completed"}, {id: "phase-3", status: "in_progress"}])
  • Phase 3 complete: functions.update_plan([{id: "phase-3", status: "completed"}, {id: "phase-4", status: "in_progress"}])
  • Phase 4 complete: functions.update_plan([{id: "phase-4", status: "completed"}])

Data Flow

User Input (skill name, roles, pipelines)
    ↓
Phase 1: Requirements Analysis
    ↓ Output: teamConfig
    ↓
Phase 2: Scaffold Generation
    ↓ Input: teamConfig
    ↓ Output: SKILL.md + skillDir
    ↓
Phase 3: Content Generation
    ↓ Input: teamConfig + skillDir
    ↓ Output: roles/, specs/, templates/
    ↓
Phase 4: Validation
    ↓ Input: teamConfig + all files
    ↓ Output: validation report
    ↓
Return summary to user

Core Rules

  1. Start Immediately: First action is progress tracking initialization, second action is Phase 1 execution
  2. Parse Every Output: Extract teamConfig from Phase 1 for subsequent phases
  3. Auto-Continue: After each phase, automatically execute next phase
  4. Progressive Phase Loading: Read phase docs ONLY when that phase is about to execute
  5. Golden Sample Fidelity: Generated files must match team-lifecycle-v4 patterns
  6. DO NOT STOP: Continuous workflow until all 4 phases complete

Input Processing

Convert user input to structured format:

SKILL_NAME: [kebab-case name, e.g., team-code-review]
DOMAIN: [what this team does, e.g., "multi-stage code review with security analysis"]
ROLES: [worker roles beyond coordinator, e.g., "analyst, reviewer, security-expert"]
PIPELINES: [pipeline types and flows, e.g., "review-only: SCAN-001 → REVIEW-001 → REPORT-001"]
SESSION_PREFIX: [3-4 char, e.g., TCR]

Error Handling

  • Invalid role name: Must be lowercase alphanumeric with hyphens, max 20 chars
  • Circular dependencies: Detect and report in pipeline validation
  • Missing golden sample: Fall back to embedded templates in phase files
  • Directory conflict: Warn if skill directory already exists, ask user to confirm overwrite
Repository
catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow
Last updated
First committed

Also appears in

catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow
Stale

last in sync Mar 27, 2026

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.