team-perf-opt

Unified team skill for performance optimization. Coordinator orchestrates pipeline, workers are team-worker agents. Supports single/fan-out/independent parallel modes. Triggers on "team perf-opt".

Quality

55%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./.codex/skills/team-perf-opt/SKILL.md

Team Performance Optimization

Profile application performance, identify bottlenecks, design optimization strategies, implement changes, benchmark improvements, and review code quality.

Architecture

Skill(skill="team-perf-opt", args="<task-description>")
                    |
         SKILL.md (this file) = Router
                    |
     +--------------+--------------+
     |                             |
  no --role flag              --role <name>
     |                             |
  Coordinator                  Worker
  roles/coordinator/role.md    roles/<name>/role.md
     |
     +-- analyze -> dispatch -> spawn workers -> STOP
                                    |
                    +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
                    v       v       v       v       v
                 [profiler] [strategist] [optimizer] [benchmarker] [reviewer]
                 (team-worker agents)

Pipeline (Single mode):
  PROFILE-001 -> STRATEGY-001 -> IMPL-001 -> BENCH-001 + REVIEW-001 (fix cycle)

Pipeline (Fan-out mode):
  PROFILE-001 -> STRATEGY-001 -> [IMPL-B01..N](parallel) -> BENCH+REVIEW per branch

Pipeline (Independent mode):
  [Pipeline A: PROFILE-A->STRATEGY-A->IMPL-A->BENCH-A+REVIEW-A]
  [Pipeline B: PROFILE-B->STRATEGY-B->IMPL-B->BENCH-B+REVIEW-B] (parallel)

Role Registry

Role	Path	Prefix	Inner Loop
coordinator	roles/coordinator/role.md	—	—
profiler	roles/profiler/role.md	PROFILE-*	false
strategist	roles/strategist/role.md	STRATEGY-*	false
optimizer	roles/optimizer/role.md	IMPL-, FIX-	true
benchmarker	roles/benchmarker/role.md	BENCH-*	false
reviewer	roles/reviewer/role.md	REVIEW-, QUALITY-	false

Role Router

Parse $ARGUMENTS:

Has --role <name> → Read roles/<name>/role.md, execute Phase 2-4
No --role → roles/coordinator/role.md, execute entry router

Delegation Lock

Coordinator is a PURE ORCHESTRATOR. It coordinates, it does NOT do.

Before calling ANY tool, apply this check:

Tool Call	Verdict	Reason
`spawn_agent`, `wait_agent`, `close_agent`, `send_message`, `assign_task`	ALLOWED	Orchestration
`list_agents`	ALLOWED	Agent health check
`request_user_input`	ALLOWED	User interaction
`mcp__ccw-tools__team_msg`	ALLOWED	Message bus
`Read/Write` on `.workflow/.team/` files	ALLOWED	Session state
`Read` on `roles/`, `commands/`, `specs/`	ALLOWED	Loading own instructions
`Read/Grep/Glob` on project source code	BLOCKED	Delegate to worker
`Edit` on any file outside `.workflow/`	BLOCKED	Delegate to worker
`Bash("ccw cli ...")`	BLOCKED	Only workers call CLI
`Bash` running build/test/lint commands	BLOCKED	Delegate to worker

If a tool call is BLOCKED: STOP. Create a task, spawn a worker.

No exceptions for "simple" tasks. Even a single-file read-and-report MUST go through spawn_agent.

Shared Constants

Session prefix: PERF-OPT
Session path: .workflow/.team/PERF-OPT-<slug>-<date>/
Team name: perf-opt
CLI tools: ccw cli --mode analysis (read-only), ccw cli --mode write (modifications)
Message bus: mcp__ccw-tools__team_msg(session_id=<session-id>, ...)

Worker Spawn Template

Coordinator spawns workers using this template:

spawn_agent({
  agent_type: "team_worker",
  task_name: "<task-id>",
  fork_context: false,
  items: [
    { type: "text", text: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: <skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
requirement: <task-description>
inner_loop: <true|false>

Read role_spec file (<skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md) to load Phase 2-4 domain instructions.` },

    { type: "text", text: `## Task Context
task_id: <task-id>
title: <task-title>
description: <task-description>
pipeline_phase: <pipeline-phase>` },

    { type: "text", text: `## Upstream Context
<prev_context>` }
  ]
})

After spawning, use wait_agent({ targets: [...], timeout_ms: 900000 }) to collect results, then close_agent({ target }) each worker.

Inner Loop roles (optimizer): Set inner_loop: true. Single-task roles (profiler, strategist, benchmarker, reviewer): Set inner_loop: false.

Model Selection Guide

Performance optimization is measurement-driven. Profiler and benchmarker need consistent context for before/after comparison.

Role	reasoning_effort	Rationale
profiler	high	Must identify subtle bottlenecks from profiling data
strategist	high	Optimization strategy requires understanding tradeoffs
optimizer	high	Performance-critical code changes need precision
benchmarker	medium	Benchmark execution follows defined measurement plan
reviewer	high	Must verify optimizations don't introduce regressions

Benchmark Context Sharing with fork_context

For before/after comparison, benchmarker should share context with profiler's baseline:

spawn_agent({
  agent_type: "team_worker",
  task_name: "BENCH-001",
  fork_context: true,   // Share context so benchmarker sees profiler's baseline metrics
  reasoning_effort: "medium",
  items: [...]
})

User Commands

Command	Action
`check` / `status`	Output execution status graph (branch-grouped), no advancement
`resume` / `continue`	Check worker states, advance next step
`revise <TASK-ID> [feedback]`	Create revision task + cascade downstream (scoped to branch)
`feedback <text>`	Analyze feedback impact, create targeted revision chain
`recheck`	Re-run quality check
`improve [dimension]`	Auto-improve weakest dimension

Session Directory

.workflow/.team/PERF-OPT-<slug>-<date>/
+-- session.json                    # Session metadata + status + parallel_mode
+-- artifacts/
|   +-- baseline-metrics.json       # Profiler: before-optimization metrics
|   +-- bottleneck-report.md        # Profiler: ranked bottleneck findings
|   +-- optimization-plan.md        # Strategist: prioritized optimization plan
|   +-- benchmark-results.json      # Benchmarker: after-optimization metrics
|   +-- review-report.md            # Reviewer: code review findings
|   +-- branches/B01/...            # Fan-out branch artifacts
|   +-- pipelines/A/...             # Independent pipeline artifacts
+-- explorations/                   # Shared explore cache
+-- wisdom/patterns.md              # Discovered patterns and conventions
+-- discussions/                    # Discussion records
+-- .msg/messages.jsonl             # Team message bus
+-- .msg/meta.json                  # Session metadata

v4 Agent Coordination

Message Semantics

Intent	API	Example
Queue supplementary info (don't interrupt)	`send_message`	Send baseline metrics to running optimizer
Assign fix after benchmark regression	`assign_task`	Assign FIX task when benchmark shows regression
Check running agents	`list_agents`	Verify agent health during resume

Agent Health Check

Use list_agents({}) in handleResume and handleComplete:

// Reconcile session state with actual running agents
const running = list_agents({})
// Compare with session.json active tasks
// Reset orphaned tasks (in_progress but agent gone) to pending

Named Agent Targeting

Workers are spawned with task_name: "<task-id>" enabling direct addressing:

send_message({ target: "IMPL-001", items: [...] }) -- send strategy details to optimizer
assign_task({ target: "IMPL-001", items: [...] }) -- assign fix after benchmark regression
close_agent({ target: "BENCH-001" }) -- cleanup after benchmarking completes

Baseline-to-Result Pipeline

Profiler baseline metrics flow through the pipeline and must reach benchmarker for comparison:

PROFILE-001 produces baseline-metrics.json in artifacts/
Coordinator includes baseline reference in upstream context for all downstream workers
BENCH-001 reads baseline and compares against post-optimization measurements
If regression detected, coordinator auto-creates FIX task with regression details

Completion Action

When the pipeline completes:

request_user_input({
  questions: [{
    question: "Team pipeline complete. What would you like to do?",
    header: "Completion",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Archive & Clean (Recommended)", description: "Archive session, clean up tasks and team resources" },
      { label: "Keep Active", description: "Keep session active for follow-up work or inspection" },
      { label: "Export Results", description: "Export deliverables to a specified location, then clean" }
    ]
  }]
})

Specs Reference

specs/pipelines.md — Pipeline definitions and task registry
specs/team-config.json — Team configuration

Error Handling

Scenario	Resolution
Unknown --role value	Error with role registry list
Role file not found	Error with expected path (roles/{name}/role.md)
Profiling tool not available	Fallback to static analysis methods
Benchmark regression detected	Auto-create FIX task with regression details
Review-fix cycle exceeds 3 iterations	Escalate to user
One branch IMPL fails	Mark that branch failed, other branches continue
Fast-advance conflict	Coordinator reconciles on next callback
Completion action fails	Default to Keep Active

Repository: catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow
Commit: 0f8e801

Last updated: 4 days ago
Created: 4 days ago

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.