Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered router document: terse tables, a complete worker-spawn template, explicit coordination/timeout/escalation semantics, and a clear pipeline with a verification loop. The main defect is that every referenced role and spec file is missing from the bundle, so the skill's progressive-disclosure structure — its whole mechanism for delivering actual instructions — is unverifiable and unusable as shipped here.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced bundle files (roles/<role>/role.md for all five roles and the six specs/*.md files) so the router's links resolve; without them the skill carries no executable domain instructions.
Drop the redundant 'Scan-to-Diagnosis Context Flow' spawn_agent snippet (it duplicates the Worker Spawn Template) and collapse the Model Selection Guide — where every role is 'high' — into a single line stating that all workers use reasoning_effort: high.
Make the User Commands handlers concrete: specify what the coordinator does on 'check'/'status' and 'resume'/'continue' (e.g., which files are read, what status graph output looks like) instead of one-phrase action summaries.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean, table-driven router documentation (Role Registry, Delegation Lock table, Error Handling table) that assumes Claude's competence. Minor trims are available: the Model Selection Guide table assigns 'high' to every role and could be one line, and the 'Scan-to-Diagnosis Context Flow' section repeats the Worker Spawn Template with a second spawn_agent snippet. Not 3 because there is no padding explaining concepts Claude already knows. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete: a complete spawn_agent template with all fields, exact API call signatures with parameters (wait_agent({ timeout_ms: 1800000 }), close_agent({ target }), followup_task with STATUS_CHECK/FINALIZE escalation and timings), the session directory layout, and named agent targeting examples. Not 5 because execution depends on roles/<role>/role.md and specs/ files, none of which are present in the bundle, and the User Commands table ('View execution status graph', 'Advance to next step') leaves handler behavior unspecified. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The scan -> diagnose -> optimize -> verify pipeline is clearly sequenced with a validation stage (verifier role), an explicit feedback loop (verify fail -> followup_task OPT-fix, GC loop capped at 2 rounds), timed-out agent handling, and escalation to the user when 'GC loop stuck > 2 rounds'. The Delegation Lock adds a per-tool-call checkpoint for the coordinator. All anchors of the top level are present in what is written. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are clearly signaled and one level deep (Role Registry table linking roles/<name>/role.md, Specs Reference list linking specs/*.md), but none of the referenced files exist in the skill bundle — no roles/, specs/, or commands/ directories are present alongside SKILL.md. Since this file is a pure router whose entire payload lives behind those links, the disclosure structure cannot actually be navigated. Not 2 because the in-file organization and signaling itself is good, not placeholders. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |