Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable and well-sequenced with strong validation checkpoints and clear single-level navigation; its only weakness is mild verbosity from restating attribution and a long report template. The lowest dimension is conciseness.
Suggestions
Consolidate the attribution guidance: the intro's 'attribution is the single most important job' framing and Step 3.5 overlap — keep the rule list in Step 3.5 and shorten the intro to a one-line pointer.
Trim the Step 5 report template to the essential structure; the per-cell annotations and the sample rows add length without adding new guidance beyond the surrounding rules.
Move the 'Any genuine failure' taxonomy table in Step 3 into a separate references file (e.g. taxonomy.md) and link to it, so the main flow stays scannable while the full code table remains one level deep.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and mostly earns its tokens — concrete tool names, thresholds, and a report template with little concept padding — but the attribution idea is stated twice (once in the intro, again as a full Step 3.5) and the report template is verbose, so it sits just below fully lean. It is not a 3 (no padded explanations of things Claude already knows) nor a 5 (minor repetition and template length could still be trimmed). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable guidance: specific MCP tool names and parameters (`mcp__cekura__call_logs_list` with `page_size=20`), concrete heuristic thresholds (`< 25s`, same normalized agent line `≥4×`), an exact per-call record schema, enumerated `call_ended_reason` values, and a copy-paste markdown report template covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced Step 0–6 workflow with explicit validation/stop checkpoints (missing MCP tools → stop; empty agent description → stop; zero call logs → stop), a cheap-first-then-verify feedback loop, and a "When to stop / redirect" error-recovery section — satisfying the batch-operation validation requirement. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files are present, but the body is a single well-organized document with clear step-section headers and one clearly-signaled one-level reference to the sibling `cekura-generate-scenarios` skill, meeting the simple-skill exception for well-organized content with no external references needed. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |