Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sequenced, validation-rich overview with strong workflow clarity and concrete actionable orchestration guidance, but it is somewhat dense for an overview and its progressive-disclosure structure is undermined by many missing referenced bundle files (phases/, recipes/, hooks/ all absent). Fixing the bundle so referenced paths resolve would raise the progressive_disclosure score.
Suggestions
Add the referenced phase files (phases/setup.md, phases/loop.md, phases/promote.md, phases/collect.md, phases/debug.md, phases/reproduce.md, phases/regression.md), recipe files (recipes/provider-managed.md, recipes/runtime-created.md, recipes/custom-mocks.md), and hooks/repro-gate.sh so every path in the body resolves — currently every phase link is a dead reference.
Move inline reference-grade detail out of the overview and into the phase files — the full repro.json field list, the gate-override JSON structure, and the N = clamp(⌈2/p̂⌉, 4, 10) formula belong in phases/reproduce.md, leaving the overview with the invariant summary and a pointer.
Either reference references/phase-2-failure-collection.md and references/phase-3-diagnosis.md from the body (they exist but are orphaned) or remove them, so the in-bundle references and the body's referenced paths agree.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The prose assumes Claude's competence (no generic concept explainers) and is dense rather than padded, but it inlines reference-grade detail in the overview — the full repro.json field schema, the gate-override JSON blob, and the N = clamp(⌈2/p̂⌉, 4, 10) formula — that the progressive-disclosure model places in referenced phase files, so it could be trimmed. It sits above the midpoint but not at fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance is pervasive — the repro.json schema, the batch 'name' labeling convention with literal examples, exact tool names (mcp__cekura__cekura_skill_started, scenarios_run_*, results_retrieve), and file paths — with only minor gaps because the actual phase mechanics are deferred to referenced files. It is an orchestration/instruction skill so the absence of code is not penalized. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-phase table with per-phase files and purposes is followed by explicit sequencing rules ('Announce every phase entry as Iteration N · <Phase>', 'Never parallelize across a phase boundary') and dense validation checkpoints (must-fail-first gate, verify ≥ M of N, readback attestation, regression sweep, revert on collateral damage, flake → eval invalid), with feedback loops for blocked reproduction and drift. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The overview is well designed as a one-level-deep reference model (phase table, recipes, reference files clearly signaled), but scored against the actual bundle most referenced paths are dangling: phases/setup.md, phases/loop.md, phases/promote.md (and collect/debug/reproduce/regression), recipes/*.md, and hooks/repro-gate.sh do not exist — only references/manifest.schema.json and references/manifest-guide.md are present, while references/phase-2-failure-collection.md and phase-3-diagnosis.md exist but are not referenced in the body. The broken navigation prevents scoring above 3. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |