CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

consult-codex

Dual-AI code analysis pairing OpenAI Codex with Claude code-searcher — the lightest consult variant, two citation-verified perspectives. Use for a quick second opinion on a code question.

62

Quality

72%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

High

Do not use without reviewing

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/consult-codex/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A highly actionable, well-sequenced workflow with strong validation checkpoints, but it is padded with dated rationale and version notes and does not use any reference files despite length and an unsignaled cross-reference.

Suggestions

Move the failure-rationale annotations, dated version history ('GPT-5.6-terra', 'corrected 2026-08-01'), and nvm bug-hunt narrative into a reference file or a 'deprecated/old patterns' section to reduce token load and keep time-sensitive notes out of the main flow.

Extract the jq recipe catalog and the Codex dispatch forms into reference files under references/ and link to them one level deep, which would also resolve the dangling 'consult-panel §1d' cross-reference.

Trim explanatory prose ('Why this exact form (each piece prevents a failure seen in practice)') to bare command-and-why-it-matters bullets so every token earns its place.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is densely annotated with lengthy rationale ('why this exact form'), dated version notes ('GPT-5.6-terra in seven places', 'corrected 2026-08-01'), and nvm bug-history commentary that pads the skill beyond what Claude needs to execute; noticeably verbose.

2 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable: real bash setup, concrete jq recipes, exact two-phase dispatch forms with RUN_ID/PROJECT_DIR substitution, and a copy-paste-ready comparison report template covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequence (build prompt → setup → two-phase dispatch → parse → cleanup → error handling → comparison) with explicit validation checkpoints (PROJECT_DIR dir check, jq hard-dependency fail-fast, codex binary resilience, timeout watchdog, empty-output guards) and feedback loops for error recovery.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ absent), so all ~390 lines are inlined; the body cross-references 'consult-panel §1d' but no such reference file is present, and the long jq recipes and dispatch forms are inline rather than split into well-signaled one-level-deep references.

3 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, third-person description that explicitly covers both capability and trigger; it is specific and distinct but slightly under-covered on trigger synonyms and scope relative to the body's full use-cases.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

States the concrete actions of pairing OpenAI Codex with Claude's code-searcher and delivering 'two citation-verified perspectives' plus a 'quick second opinion', listing several specific actions though slightly short of comprehensive coverage.

4 / 5

Completeness

Clearly answers both what ('Dual-AI code analysis pairing OpenAI Codex with Claude code-searcher — two citation-verified perspectives') and when ('Use for a quick second opinion on a code question'); the when-clause is explicit but somewhat narrow.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases a user would say ('quick second opinion on a code question', 'code analysis') but misses common synonyms like 'code review', 'debugging', or 'architecture' that the body itself lists.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The Codex + code-searcher pairing is a distinct niche, but 'the lightest consult variant' signals a family of sibling consult skills, creating minor overlap risk with closely related skills.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
centminmod/my-claude-code-setup
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.