CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

close-day

Use when the work-journal app asks to write the end-of-day journal entry from the day's hour summaries, meetings, and category totals.

68

Quality

86%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is close-day in chandler767/WorkJournal

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, highly actionable instruction-only skill: exact output structure, edge cases, and a strict reply contract, with well-organized sections and no bundle sprawl. The only trimmable fat is the full JSON Schema block for a single-property output and minor repetition of the 'None.' rule.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and instructional with no concept explanations, but the 15-line JSON Schema block specifies a single required 'markdown' string property that could be stated in one line, and the 'None.' guidance is repeated across two sections. These are minor trimmable instances, matching 'efficient; minor over-explanation that could be trimmed' rather than the every-token-earns-its-place anchor.

4 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is fully concrete for an instruction-only skill: exact headings and order ('## Summary', '## Timeline', ...), exact per-section formats ('one bullet per hour with notes', 'a bullet per category with hours and minutes, from totals only'), exact record shapes, and covered edge cases ('may be absent or [] for older hours', 'Empty input gives empty arrays'). The strict reply framing ('ONLY one JSON object... No prose, no code fences') removes ambiguity.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A simple, single-purpose skill whose single action is unambiguous: read the named file (in parts if long, with the explicit checkpoint 'until you have read all of it, then answer'), then emit the JSON. There is no destructive or batch operation, so the validation cap does not apply, and the simple-skill exception holds.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundle exists), and the content is organized into clearly labeled sections (Rules, Input, Rules specific to this skill, Output schema). Per the rubric guideline, this earns a 5.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A clear, concise, third-person trigger description with an explicit 'Use when' clause and a well-scoped niche. Its main weakness is that the capability is only implied through the when-clause and the action coverage is narrow (one composite action), leaving specificity and completeness just above midpoint.

Suggestions

Add a standalone third-person capability statement (e.g. 'Writes the end-of-day journal entry...') before the 'Use when' clause so the 'what' is explicit rather than embedded in the trigger.

Include natural synonyms or variations such as 'daily summary', 'wrap-up', or 'EOD entry' to broaden trigger-term coverage.

Name the concrete outputs produced (markdown journal with Summary, Timeline, category totals, meetings, action items) to raise action specificity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('work-journal app', 'end-of-day journal entry') and one composite action broken into its inputs ('hour summaries, meetings, and category totals'), matching the 'domain plus 1-2 concrete actions, not comprehensive' anchor; it does not list several distinct actions, so it falls short of a 4.

3 / 5

Completeness

Both what and when are present: 'Use when the work-journal app asks...' is an explicit trigger, and 'write the end-of-day journal entry from the day's hour summaries...' states the what. It is not a 5 because the what is only embedded inside the when-clause rather than clearly stated as a standalone capability with concrete trigger phrases.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural domain phrases like 'end-of-day journal entry', 'hour summaries', 'meetings', and 'category totals' give good keyword coverage with only a few natural terms missing. It falls short of 5 because no synonyms or variations (e.g. 'daily wrap-up', 'EOD summary') are included.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The description is tied to a specific app and artifact ('the work-journal app', 'end-of-day journal entry'), giving it a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

chandler767/WorkJournal

Path

.tessl/plugins/local/work-journal/skills/close-day/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.