Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly actionable body: it specifies the exact command, output format, type-selection rules, and subject-line constraints in five clear steps without wasting a token. The only improvement would be a short worked example of a finished commit message to make the format concrete at a glance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line carries skill-specific guidance ('Read only the staged changes with git diff --cached', 'Empty files and stubs don't count') with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows — every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives a concrete command (git diff --cached), an exact output template (<type>(<optional scope>): <subject>), a 7-row type decision table, and precise subject rules — mostly executable with the minor gap that no worked example of a finished message is shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly numbered steps with an explicit mixed-changes edge case and a safety boundary ('Do not commit, just suggest it'); as a simple, single-task, non-destructive skill the action is unambiguous, meeting the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references, organized into well-scoped sections (trigger, steps, type table, subject rules), which satisfies the simple-skill criterion for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |