Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable with concrete commands and a clear orchestration sequence, but weakened by padded PDF-parser prose and incomplete progressive disclosure: real bundle references are not signaled from the body and one referenced file does not exist.
Suggestions
Trim the PDF-parser section: drop vendor/promotional descriptors ("微软出品", "OpenDataLab 出品", "准确率 98.7%") and keep only the chain order, config knobs, and invocation flags.
Link the existing bundle files from the body — e.g. replace the inline 机构白名单 summary with "见 [references/机构白名单.md](references/机构白名单.md)" and link [assets/研报分析模板.md](assets/研报分析模板.md) and [references/评级体系说明.md](references/评级体系说明.md).
Fix or remove the dangling [PDF_IMAGE_RESEARCH.md](../PDF_IMAGE_RESEARCH.md) link, since that file is not present in the bundle.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient tables and commands, but the PDF-parser section includes promotional/background prose Claude doesn't need ("微软出品", "OpenDataLab 出品", "准确率 98.7%", "专为中文 PDF 优化") that could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands covering common cases (stock/industry/list, with and without --download) plus a concrete config/settings.json example, matching fully executable guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Team-First pipeline is a clear numbered sequence with a quality-gate validation checkpoint, but no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop is described, so it stays below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure exists (script table, agent table), but existing reference files (机构白名单.md, 评级体系说明.md) and the report template asset are not linked from the body, the long PDF-parsing detail is inlined, and the body references a non-existent ../PDF_IMAGE_RESEARCH.md. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |