Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, highly actionable reference for a unified document reader, with concrete tool calls, a clear return envelope, and useful operational notes. Its only weaknesses are minor illustrative padding in the Workflows section and a fully inline structure that leaves progressive disclosure at good rather than excellent.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows (no 'what is a PDF' padding), with each table and notes block earning its place; it is not a 5 because the Workflows section contains somewhat illustrative scenario walkthroughs (paper summary, contract review) that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready read_document(...) calls across the common formats plus a concrete JSON return envelope and per-format extra-key table, fully covering the common cases per the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-action read-only skill where the action is unambiguous ('Always call the tool directly — do not run Python from bash'), and it includes an explicit OCR-empty checkpoint ('If OCR returns empty, tell the user; don't fabricate'), satisfying the simple-skill exception and the feedback-loop note. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clear sections (Purpose, Supported formats, Usage, Return envelope, Workflows, Notes) with no nested references and nothing that obviously belongs in a separate file; it is not a 5 because everything is inline with no one-level-deep reference split, and the body exceeds the <50-line simple-skill threshold. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |