Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is highly actionable, lean, and well-sequenced with validation and feedback loops, but progressive disclosure is undermined by a broken examples.md reference and a monolithic structure with no actual bundle files.
Suggestions
Create the referenced examples.md (or remove the dead link) so the navigation pointer resolves to a real file.
Consider moving the large config.json format and Review Criteria sections into a separate reference file (e.g. CONFIG.md / REVIEW.md) to keep SKILL.md an overview pointing one level deep.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense reference material (SignalEngine contract, config.json schema, market-detection table, review criteria) with no padding explaining basic concepts Claude already knows, and it assumes competence throughout. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready guidance: an exact SignalEngine signature, a full config.json example, an exact syntax-check bash command, regex normalization patterns, and concrete action_items examples. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (syntax check, evaluate results) and an edit → backtest → re-evaluate feedback loop, plus a quality checklist and hard-gate review criteria. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body references examples.md ('[examples.md](examples.md) — example call sequence') but no such file exists in the bundle, and substantial reference material (config format, review criteria) is inline rather than split into well-signaled one-level-deep files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |