Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-organized, concise, and gives a clear ordered workflow with named tools and field specs. Its main gaps are the absence of example tool invocations and an explicit verification step before the batch save operations.
Suggestions
Add one example tool invocation with expected arguments/return shape for read_script_for_extraction and save_dedup_characters so the guidance is copy-paste ready.
Insert an explicit verification checkpoint after extraction and before saving (e.g., '确认提取的角色/场景均为当前集真实涉及，且无重复') to close the batch-operation validation gap.
Clarify how to decide reuse-vs-create when names differ slightly (aliases/variants) to make the dedup rule more actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: field lists with brief annotations, a 6-step workflow, and short rules, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows — every section earns its tokens, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It names concrete tools (read_script_for_extraction, save_dedup_characters, etc.) and specific field specs with word counts, but shows no example tool invocations or argument shapes, so guidance is concrete yet incomplete — the level-2 anchor rather than copy-paste-ready level 3. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The six steps are clearly sequenced and include a dedup/reuse rule, but there is no explicit verification checkpoint (e.g., confirm extracted entities match the current episode) for the batch save operations, which the rubric caps at 2 for batch/destructive workflows. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no external references needed, and content is well-organized into clearly labeled sections (角色/场景/道具提取规范, 使用步骤, 当前集规则), meeting the simple-skill allowance for a top score on organization alone. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |