Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable instruction skill with a concrete field schema, a worked prompt-format example, and a clear sequenced workflow. Its main gap is the absence of an explicit validation checkpoint around the batch save step.
Suggestions
Insert an explicit verification step in 使用步骤 after save_storyboards, e.g. confirm scene_id values exist in the returned scenes and character_ids are within the allowed role list before finalizing.
Add a brief feedback loop for save/update failures (review error → fix fields → re-save), mirroring the validation pattern expected for batch operations.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and instructional, defining the shot-element schema and rules without explaining concepts Claude already knows; nearly every line is task-relevant, with only minor redundancy (时长 restated in 拆解原则 and element 11), matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete executable guidance: named tool calls (read_storyboard_context, save_storyboards, update_storyboard), an explicit 17-field schema, and a fully worked video_prompt tagged-format example that is effectively copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | 使用步骤 provides a clear 5-step sequence, but the batch save (save_storyboards 一次性保存完整分镜) has no explicit validation/verification checkpoint, which per the guidelines caps workflow clarity at 2 for batch operations. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the content is self-contained and organized into clear, well-labeled sections (拆解原则, 镜头要素, 使用步骤, association/binding rules, quality), satisfying the 'well-organized sections with no external references' standard. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |