Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean instruction skill: concrete workflows, a copy-paste-ready template, and precise conventions with no padding. The only gap is the absence of an explicit validation step after writing/updating ADRs and the index.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~80-line body is lean with zero concept explanations — every section (directory layout, workflows, naming, template, TOC format) adds information Claude would not infer on its own. It assumes competence and every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable for an instruction-only skill: a copy-paste-ready ADR template, a concrete file-naming pattern ("ADR-{NNN}-{kebab-case-slug}.md" with zero-padding rules), and an exact TOC table row example. The create/update/supersede workflows each give specific, direct steps including the FDR sweep. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three multi-step workflows (create, update, supersede) are clearly sequenced with an index-reading checkpoint up front, but there is no explicit post-write verification step (e.g. confirming the new ADR appears in the TOC or that numbering is unique). Not 5 for missing validation checkpoints; not 3 since sequences are complete and unambiguous, and no destructive/batch operation triggers the cap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill has no bundle files and no content that belongs in a separate reference — the template, naming, and TOC format are exactly the inline material needed. Sections are well-organized and self-contained, and it correctly points to workspace artifacts (docs/adr/INDEX.md) rather than burying detail. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |