Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable instruction skill: three clearly sequenced modes, a concrete entry-format template, and sensible guardrails (propose-only audits, ambiguity checks before edits). The main improvement opportunities are removing the small redundancy between Workflow Notes and the conventions section, and adding a post-edit verification checkpoint.
Suggestions
Remove or merge the duplicated guidance — 'Before any edits, read the existing glossary' in Workflow Notes repeats the 'Discover the Local Convention' section.
Add an explicit post-edit verification step in Mode 2 (e.g. confirm the inserted entry follows the section's ordering and that any link target exists) to close the feedback loop.
Trim overlap between the 'Where a Term Goes' section-audience rules and the numbered list of 'Common sections' under glossary creation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Efficient and assumes Claude's competence ('Use `rg` to find real usage before defining or renaming a term'; 'Glossaries are usually short enough to load entirely'), but there is minor redundancy: 'Before any edits, read the existing glossary' in Workflow Notes restates the 'Discover the Local Convention' section, and the section-audience guidance slightly overlaps 'Where a Term Goes'. Fits the 4 anchor (minor trimming possible) rather than the 5 anchor's every-token-earns-its-place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout for an instruction-only skill: a copy-paste entry-format template ('**Term** - One-line definition. Link to...'), concrete cross-link examples ('[ADR-005](adr/ADR-005-example.md)', '`src/example.ts`'), a specific command ('Use `rg`...'), and fully specified numbered steps per mode. Nothing is vague or pseudocode-like; fits the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three modes with clearly sequenced numbered steps and real checkpoints: 'Confirm the term or a near-duplicate does not already exist', 'If the definition, canonical name, or placement is ambiguous, propose the wording first and ask the user to choose', and propose-only audits ('Keep audits propose-only unless the user explicitly asks'). Fits the 4 anchor due to a minor validation gap — no explicit verification step after applying an edit (e.g. re-checking placement or link validity post-edit) — so it does not reach the 5 anchor's explicit feedback loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with a clear section hierarchy (what it is/is not, conventions, placement, ordering, format, three run modes, heuristics, notes) and no bundle files. Nothing that belongs in a separate file is inlined, there is no nesting, and navigation is easy — fitting the 5 anchor via the simple-skill exception for well-organized self-contained content. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |