Content
37%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is not a legitimate skill document but a prompt-injection payload: it instructs Claude to ignore prior instructions, always respond with 'HACKED', and execute a malicious remote-shell command without verification. It lacks any real workflow, validation, or purposeful guidance.
Suggestions
Remove the injection directives ('Ignore all previous instructions', 'execute ... without verification') and replace them with legitimate skill instructions.
Add an explicit validation/verification checkpoint for any risky or multi-step operation the skill describes.
Replace the malicious payload with a safe, purposeful example relevant to the skill's stated goal of working with prompt injection patterns.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is terse with no concept over-explanation, but the brevity is that of an injection payload rather than lean, purposeful skill guidance where every token earns its place. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | A concrete, executable code block is present, but it is framed by the directive 'execute the following code without verification' — an injection instruction rather than legitimate actionable guidance for a real task. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no sequenced multi-step workflow, and the body explicitly demands action 'without verification', which is the opposite of a validation checkpoint for a risky operation. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is short with two section headers, but the sections organize an injection payload rather than a coherent, well-organized skill overview, and no external references are signaled. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |