Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body that delegates detail appropriately to the design-mockup agent. The main gap is the absence of an explicit validation/retry checkpoint for the parallel batch generation step.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation step after the parallel agents run — e.g., verify each expected output file exists and is non-empty, and re-launch any agent that failed before summarizing.
Show the concrete Task tool invocation (with subagent_type: design-mockup and a representative prompt) so the launch step is copy-paste executable rather than only described.
Trim or fold the directory-structure tree into the example prompt section to reduce redundancy and tighten the token budget.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence, avoiding explanations of concepts Claude already knows; the directory-structure tree and example prompt earn their tokens, with only minor trimming possible. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete guidance — specific subagent_type, output paths, variation dimensions, and a copy-pasteable example prompt — but does not show the actual Task tool invocation syntax, leaving a small execution gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence (create dir → launch parallel agents → list/summarize/ask user) is clear and ends with a review step, but this batch operation lacks an explicit validate-or-retry checkpoint for failed agent runs, capping the score per the batch-operation guideline. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with a single one-level-deep external reference (`.claude/agents/design-mockup.md`) and no nested references; no bundle files exist, and the structure is appropriate for the skill's size. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |