Content
50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body provides a clear, mostly actionable Rails scaffolding workflow with genuine tool calls, but is weakened by a missing Supporting Files section (leaving a placeholder path), redundant narration, and no explicit validation feedback loop for a destructive workflow.
Suggestions
Add the referenced 'Supporting Files' section with the real absolute path to create_rails_project.sh so Step 2's command is copy-paste ready.
Insert an explicit validation checkpoint after the setup script (verify bin/setup succeeded / server session_id returned) before proceeding to start the dev server.
Trim the dual zh/en ask_user blocks to one canonical version and cut the Example Interaction that merely re-lists the process steps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient step-by-step guidance, but dual zh/en JSON blocks, a full user-facing success template, and an Example Interaction that re-narrates already-listed steps add padding that could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete tool calls (glob, terminal, file_reader) and copy-paste JSON prompts are strong, but Step 2 uses a placeholder path and cites a 'Supporting Files' section that does not appear in the file, leaving an executable gap. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is clear with a directory-empty checkpoint and error handling, but as a destructive/batch operation (clones into cwd, deletes .git, installs system packages, db:prepare) it lacks an explicit validate-before-proceed feedback loop, capping it at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single well-headed file with a one-level reference to an existing script, but the cited 'Supporting Files' section is absent, leaving navigation incompletely signaled. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |