Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is exemplary: concise, highly actionable, with explicit rules and a precise output schema. The only slight gap is workflow validation, which is largely inapplicable to this single-pass analysis skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and task-focused with no padding explaining what a PR or convention is, and consistently assumes Claude's competence ('Do not narrate your work', 'Default to no finding'). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance: named input fields, explicit flag/non-flag conditions with examples, and a copy-paste-ready result shape with a worked JSON example. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence (Inputs -> Security -> Rules -> Severities -> Result) with explicit decision checkpoints ('When in doubt, pass', 'Do not flag...'); it is not a destructive/batch operation, so a validate->retry loop is not applicable, leaving only minor validation gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the skill is self-contained; content is well-organized into clearly headed sections with no nested references and nothing that should be split into a separate file. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |