Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, lean, instruction-only workflow with concrete tool guidance and an explicit confidence gate. It scores consistently at 4, held from 5 only by the lack of an error-recovery feedback loop and mild redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, assumes Claude's competence (no explaining what merge conflicts or MDX are), and every section is operational; the only minor trim is mild redundancy between process step 4/5 and the output-schema notes on the confidence gating. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It names specific tools (get_commit_pr, read_repo_file), the three SHA refs to use with them, file entry fields, and an exact JSON output schema — concrete and actionable for an instruction-only skill, with only the exact tool call signatures left implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with an explicit confidence quality-gate (high/medium/low controlling whether files are returned) serves as the checkpoint, but there is no validate->fix->retry feedback loop, which would be needed for a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with no external bundles and well-organized sections (Inputs, Process, Security, Output schema, Tool usage); at ~75 lines it slightly exceeds the 50-line simple-skill threshold, so it lands just below the 5 reserved for clearly split, navigable content. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |