Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable instruction skill with concrete classification rules and a ready-to-use output schema; its main weaknesses are light cross-mode repetition and the absence of an explicit output-validation checkpoint.
Suggestions
Add a brief verification step in the Output section (e.g. 'confirm every currentFindings id appears in exactly one bucket and severities are unchanged') to push workflow clarity toward 5.
Factor the shared active/ignored logic that repeats across full and incremental modes into a short common block, then state only the deltas per mode, to trim conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body assumes Claude knows what PRs and code reviews are and avoids concept explanations; minor repetition across the full/incremental mode sections (active/resolved/ignored re-stated per mode) could be tightened, placing it above 3 but not fully lean at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: explicit per-mode decision rules, sufficient/insufficient reason examples, third-person reviewer_note instruction, and a copy-paste-ready JSON output schema with a full worked example covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequencing keyed on diffMode with explicit per-bucket rules and fallbacks ('When in doubt, keep a finding active', 'Do NOT mark resolved merely because absent'), but there is no explicit verify-the-output step, leaving minor checkpoint gaps short of anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file organized into well-labeled sections (Inputs, Security, Reconciliation rules, Output) with no external references needed; it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception, so it lands at 4 rather than 5, with minor organization gaps only. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |