Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, fully actionable instruction-only skill with clear decision criteria, an exact output contract, and well-organized sections, requiring no external references for its scope.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, with only mild redundancy between the 'When in doubt' line and the Output-section restatement of the same rule, fitting the 'efficient with minor trims possible' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides the exact tool name (submit_spam_verdict), a copy-paste JSON output schema, enum values for confidence, and concrete decision categories covering common cases; for an instruction-only skill this is fully actionable guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A simple single-task skill whose single action (evaluate the item, then call the verdict tool exactly once) is unambiguous, with a confidence-based fallback checkpoint and explicit guardrails (no API calls); the simple-skill exception applies and no destructive/batch cap is triggered. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references and well-organized sections (Security, What counts as spam, What NOT to flag, Output), meeting the rubric's allowance for short single-purpose skills to score 5 on structure alone. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |