Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean overview: it states exactly what the plugin hooks, what the feedback means, and its boundary conditions in eight lines with no filler. Its only weakness is that the fix-or-explain directive lacks supporting detail — no example of the warning format or guidance on choosing between fixing and explaining.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is 8 lines with zero padding: every sentence states a fact Codex could not infer (which tools are hooked, that feedback is blocking, the no-MCP/no-output edge cases). It assumes reader competence and matches anchor 5 ('lean and efficient; every token earns its place'). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The core directive — 'fix or explain the flagged comment before moving on' — is concrete behavioral guidance, but there are no examples of what the feedback looks like, what kinds of warnings occur, or how to structure an explanation. Per the code-vs-instruction note the absence of code is not penalized, yet the guidance stops short of being fully actionable, placing it between anchors 2 and 4. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple single-purpose skill under 50 lines the sequence is unambiguous (patch succeeds → warning fires → fix or explain → proceed), which would merit 5 under the simple-skill exception. It falls to 4 because 'fix or explain' leaves the decision point implicit — there is no guidance on when fixing is appropriate versus explaining. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill has no bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and is under 50 lines, so per the rubric's guideline for simple skills, well-organized sections alone justify anchor 5. The '## Scope' section cleanly groups the edge cases and nothing that belongs in a separate file is inlined. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |