CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

tech-debt-audit

Thorough, file-cited technical debt audit across 9 dimensions using AST-grep (tree-sitter), grep, LSP, and language-native tooling. Produces TECH_DEBT_AUDIT.md with severity, effort estimates, and prioritized fixes. Use when asked for codebase health check, tech debt audit, architecture review, code quality assessment, or cleanup planning. Triggers: 'tech debt', 'technical debt', 'debt audit', 'code health', 'technical debt audit', 'codebase health check', 'find tech debt', 'debt analysis', 'audit code quality'.

78

Quality

98%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tightly written, highly actionable audit protocol with concrete tool invocations, a clear phased workflow, and an explicit validation checklist. The only soft spot is that the nine inlined dimension specs could be offloaded to a reference file to sharpen the overview.

Suggestions

Move the nine per-dimension tool passes into a references/ file (e.g. DIMENSIONS.md) and keep SKILL.md as a lean overview with one-level links, improving progressive disclosure.

Add an explicit note that the audit is read-only and produces only a markdown report, so destructive-operation concerns are dispelled upfront.

The Phase 2 sub-agent prompts are illustrative; consider templating them so the delegate dimensions can be parameterized rather than hardcoded.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean throughout — every line is a concrete ast-grep/grep pattern or a brief instruction; it never explains concepts Claude already knows and assumes competence, so every token earns its place.

5 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable guidance — copy-paste-ready commands like `bash("sg -p \"import { $$$ } from '$SRC'\" -l ts .")` and `grep("TODO|FIXME|HACK|XXX|WORKAROUND|TEMP")` cover the common audit cases directly.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Phases 0–3 are clearly sequenced (Orient → Audit → Deeper Dives → Synthesize) and the 'Quick Checks Before Finishing' checklist provides explicit validation checkpoints for this batch audit, including the file:line:col citation requirement.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clear sections with no nested references, and no bundle files are needed; however the nine full dimension specs are inlined where a one-level reference could keep the overview tighter, leaving a minor organization gap.

4 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that crisply states capability, output artifact, and triggering contexts with a rich synonym set. It is concise yet comprehensive and distinct from neighbouring skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'file-cited technical debt audit across 9 dimensions', 'Produces TECH_DEBT_AUDIT.md with severity, effort estimates, and prioritized fixes' — and names the tooling (AST-grep, grep, LSP), giving comprehensive coverage.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (9-dimension audit producing TECH_DEBT_AUDIT.md) and when ('Use when asked for codebase health check, tech debt audit, architecture review, code quality assessment, or cleanup planning') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural-term coverage with synonyms — 'tech debt', 'technical debt', 'debt audit', 'code health', 'codebase health check', 'find tech debt', 'debt analysis', 'audit code quality' — matching what a user would actually say.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (technical debt audit) with distinct, specific triggers that are unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, yielding minimal conflict risk.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.