Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is lean, highly actionable, and well-structured with concrete commands and an explicit verification checkpoint. The only meaningful gap is the absence of an explicit error-recovery feedback loop when context verification fails.
Suggestions
Add a short feedback loop after the step-9 verification (e.g., 'If it does not equal feature-<name>, re-run git worktree add or stop and report') to reach full workflow-clarity maturity.
Consider splitting the long per-ecosystem Dependency Bootstrap command list into a reference file so the SKILL.md overview stays lighter, which would also strengthen progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and imperative with no padding or re-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (phase contract, numbered steps, per-ecosystem command lists) earns its place, matching the level-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands across cases (e.g., 'git worktree add -b feature-<name> .worktrees/feature-<name>', 'npm ci', 'uv sync') with common ecosystems covered, matching the level-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced steps with an approval gate and an explicit verification checkpoint (step 9: branch --show-current 'must equal feature-<name>'), but it lacks an explicit error-recovery feedback loop for what to do when verification fails, sitting just below level 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections (Phase Contract, Start, Resume, Dependency Bootstrap, Output) with no nested references and no bundle files to navigate; at ~68 body lines it is slightly over the under-50-line simple-skill threshold, so it lands at level 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |