Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured instruction set for a simple single-purpose skill, with concrete guidance and an explicit feedback loop. It scores slightly below perfect on actionability, workflow clarity, and progressive disclosure due to the absence of example questions, concrete sequencing, and section headers.
Suggestions
Add 1-2 example interview questions to make the actionability fully concrete and model the expected depth.
Make the design-tree traversal sequence explicit (e.g., a short numbered outline of how to pick the next branch) to lift workflow clarity.
Add lightweight section headers (e.g., '## Approach', '## Rules') to give the short body clear structural markers for progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Seven lean lines with no padding and no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place, matching the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable instruction ('ask one at a time, waiting for feedback', 'provide your recommended answer', 'explore the codebase instead'), but it stops short of giving example questions, keeping it below the score-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear iterative sequence is present with an explicit feedback checkpoint ('waiting for feedback on each question before continuing'), but 'walk down each branch of the design tree' is somewhat abstract without an explicit ordering, so it does not reach 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is short and logically organized into three focused paragraphs with no external references needed, but it is flat with no section headers or structural markers, placing it just below the score-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |