CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

cs-code-review

cs-review 的兼容别名(v1 沿用名)。触发后在当前 agent 中转到 cs-review,不维护独立规则或创建子 agent。

58

Quality

67%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/codestable/skills/cs-code-review/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a tight, well-structured alias entry that gives unambiguous delegation instructions and clear operational constraints. It is fully appropriate for a simple single-purpose delegation skill.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean: it states the alias purpose, the single action (call cs-review with params unchanged), and three concrete constraints, with every clause earning its place and no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows.

5 / 5

Actionability

The guidance is concrete and executable ('调用 canonical entry cs-review,参数原样传递') plus explicit prohibitions, but it stops short of a literal invocation example, leaving a minor gap versus fully copy-paste-ready instruction.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

It is a single unambiguous action (delegate to cs-review, pass params) with no destructive or batch operations requiring validation, so the simple-skill exception allows a top score for an unambiguous single step.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines with no external references needed (the skill explicitly forbids reading sibling files), and the content is appropriately contained in one short, clearly headed body, satisfying the simple-skill exception.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

42%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly explains the alias mechanism and its constraints but omits any 'Use when' trigger guidance and relies on technical skill names rather than natural user phrases. This caps completeness and weakens trigger-term quality.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g. 'Use when a v1 user invokes the legacy cs-code-review name for code review.'

Include natural trigger phrases such as 'code review' / '审查代码' alongside the technical names so users searching by intent can find the skill.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('cs-review 的兼容别名') and one concrete action ('触发后在当前 agent 中转到 cs-review'), which matches the anchor listing domain plus 1-2 concrete actions, but it describes only the aliasing mechanism rather than a comprehensive capability set.

3 / 5

Completeness

It gives a clear 'what' (alias that routes to cs-review, no independent rules) but provides no 'when' guidance, so per the missing-'Use when' cap it cannot exceed 3 even though the 'what' is explicit.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The only terms are technical skill names ('cs-review', 'cs-code-review') and jargon ('兼容别名', '子 agent'); it lacks natural phrases a user would actually say such as 'code review' or '审查代码', matching the anchor with one or two generic keywords missing natural phrasing.

2 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It is somewhat specific (clearly scoped to cs-review aliasing) but inherently overlaps with the canonical cs-review skill, which matches the anchor of being somewhat specific yet still overlapping with a similar skill.

3 / 5

Total

11

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
codestable/CodeStable
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.