Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, concise routing shim with a clear sequenced workflow and an explicit failure checkpoint, appropriately delegating detail to the authoritative cs-docs protocol. Its only gap is actionability: the 'load cs-docs' step lacks a concrete executable mechanism.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — a thin shim with brief rules and no padded explanations of concepts Claude already knows, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives specific instructions (load cs-docs by installed name, carry requested_mode: api, do not re-prompt the user) but provides no concrete executable command or mechanism for the 'load' step, fitting 'some concrete guidance but incomplete'. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence includes an explicit stop-and-report checkpoint when the main protocol cannot load, providing a validation gate; for a simple, non-destructive skill this meets the level-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is short, well-sectioned (执行规则 / 维护规则), and delegates detail to cs-docs and its references rather than duplicating it, so a simple under-50-line skill with no nested references scores 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |