Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary minimal forwarding shim: terse, concrete, sequenced with an explicit failure checkpoint, and correctly deferring all substantive detail to the authoritative cs-docs protocol. It adds only what Claude would not already infer.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~25-line body is lean and purposeful — it states the shim role, four execution rules, and maintenance rules with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only forwarding skill the guidance is concrete and complete: load cs-docs by installed skill name (explicitly not via sibling relative paths), continue under its protocol carrying requested_mode: tutorial, do not require re-invocation, and stop-and-report on load failure. The rubric does not penalize absence of code when guidance is this actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The four execution rules form a clear, ordered sequence with an explicit failure checkpoint (step 4: stop and report if the main protocol cannot load), which satisfies the validation requirement; the single-action nature of the shim fits the simple-skill allowance for a 3. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the body is well-organized into 执行规则 and 维护规则 sections and explicitly delegates all stage process, template, and gate detail to cs-docs and its references/ rather than duplicating it, matching the under-50-lines well-organized-sections allowance for a 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |