CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

cs-docs

Docs 主入口。触发:写/更新开发者指南、用户指南、API 参考;不包含 docs-neat 收尾整理。不要用于新功能实现(cs-feat)、修 bug / 诊断报错(cs-issue)、大需求拆解(cs-epic)、领域建模或 ADR 决策记录(cs-domain)。

73

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a dense, well-structured routing skill with concrete references, explicit checkpoints, and clean progressive disclosure of per-stage protocols. Its main weakness is redundancy: the core routing decision is described multiple times across the Spec, Workflow, and prose sections.

Suggestions

Consolidate the restoreDocsStage routing into one place — keep the Haskell spec and let the Workflow step and prose reference it rather than restating the branch logic.

The '唯一路由真相' paragraph largely repeats the line above it; trim to the single non-obvious point (resume from file/frontmatter state, not chat history).

Consider moving the DocsState/DocsOutcome/CheckpointReason type listings into the stage protocols if they are only needed per-stage, to further slim the overview.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient and free of basic-concept padding, but the restoreDocsStage routing logic is restated three times — once as the Haskell function, again in prose beneath it, and again in Workflow step 3 plus the '唯一路由真相' paragraph — so it could be tightened. Not a 3 because of that redundancy; not a 1 because nothing explains concepts Claude already knows.

2 / 3

Actionability

Concrete paths (`.codestable/attention.md`, `references/tutorial/protocol.md`), an explicit stageProtocol mapping, enumerated status values, and precise checkpoint reasons give copy-paste-ready, specific guidance for a routing skill.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced 6-step mainline (preflight → exitRecoverable) with explicit human checkpoints, typed resume matching, legal-status validation, and an exit-condition checklist provides feedback loops and validation gates.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The body is an overview that defers per-stage detail to one-level-deep, well-signaled references (references/{tutorial,api,focused-edit}/protocol.md, references/api/reference.md) matched to the stageProtocol table; the bundle structure on disk confirms the referenced paths exist.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise, third-person, and explicit about both capability and triggers, with strong negative-space delimiting against sibling skills. It does not pad with vague claims or buzzwords.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — '写/更新开发者指南、用户指南、API 参考' — naming three distinct document types and the write/update operations on them, matching the anchor for multiple specific concrete actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

It answers both what (write/update dev guides, user guides, API reference) and when via an explicit '触发' trigger clause, satisfying the top anchor for both what AND when.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

An explicit '触发:' clause surfaces natural terms users would say ('开发者指南、用户指南、API 参考'), giving good coverage rather than technical jargon.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Explicit exclusion of sibling skills ('不要用于...cs-feat...cs-issue...cs-epic...cs-domain' and '不包含 docs-neat 收尾整理') carves a clear niche unlikely to trigger the wrong skill.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 4 deeper-than-1-level

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
codestable/CodeStable
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.