Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, concise orchestration skill with clear sequencing, explicit validation checkpoints, and clean one-level-deep progressive disclosure. The main weakness is actionability: the authoritative spec is pseudocode and the one real command contains a path placeholder, so guidance is not fully copy-paste ready.
Suggestions
Resolve the placeholder in the executable command (e.g., give an absolute or discoverable path for codestable-workflow-next.py) so the workflow hook is copy-paste ready.
Where the Haskell spec encodes concrete rules, mirror the load-bearing ones as a short imperative checklist or table so they remain actionable without parsing the typed model.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and lean — compact Haskell-spec blocks and terse prose that assume Claude's competence, with no padding explaining basic concepts; every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides one concrete executable command and exact file paths, but the core spec is Haskell-like pseudocode and the command path uses a placeholder ('<cs-onboard skill 目录>'), leaving it not fully copy-paste ready. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The main pipeline is explicitly sequenced (preflight > parseEntryIntent > ... > exitRecoverable) with explicit validation checkpoints (HumanCheckpoint, design-review gates, batchLoopSettled, stateRecoverable) and fail-closed feedback loops for batch/destructive operations. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview mapping each stage to one-level-deep references (references/{planning,review,goal}/protocol.md and support files, all present on disk) with explicit lazy-load discipline, splitting detailed protocols out of the main file. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |