Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-organized compatibility shim that clearly sequences the delegation steps and includes a failure checkpoint. Its only weakness is that the central instruction to 'load' the master protocol is somewhat abstract without a concrete loading mechanism.
Suggestions
Specify concretely how to load cs-refactor as the authoritative protocol (e.g., the exact lookup/install-name mechanism or command) rather than the abstract directive '加载...作为权威主协议'.
Optionally show the expected shape of the 'requested_mode: fastforward' handoff so the delegation is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and token-efficient with no padding and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Steps are concrete and directive ('带上入口意图 requested_mode: fastforward'), but the core instruction to '加载 cs-refactor 作为权威主协议' lacks a concrete mechanism or command for how to load the protocol. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered sequence with an explicit halt-and-report checkpoint (step 4) for the failure case; appropriate for this simple single-purpose delegating skill. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no bundle files, organized into clear sections (执行规则, 维护规则) and explicitly deferring detailed process rules to cs-refactor and its references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |