Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an information-dense, action-oriented policy with strong validation gates, concrete templates and paths, and clear feedback loops. Its main weaknesses are length/density that could be tightened and a total absence of progressive disclosure — no reference files split out the elaborate review and learning protocols.
Suggestions
Move the elaborate 审查协议 (review protocol) and 持续学习 (learning protocol) into separate reference files (e.g. references/review-protocol.md) referenced one level deep from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
Tighten the 持续学习 section: the bounded read-repair and candidate rules repeat conditions across paragraphs and could be condensed into a short checklist.
Add a short numbered '典型流程' (typical flow) summary near the top so the section-based policy maps to an explicit step sequence for workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body avoids concept padding Claude already knows, but it is a very long, dense policy wall; the 持续学习 and 审查协议 sections in particular could be tightened or trimmed without losing operational value. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete instruction guidance — exact paths (`.codestable/work/refactor-{slug}.md`), report templates (`经验命中：{path}（{status}）；核验：{fact}；影响：{plan_or_check}`), thresholds (max 3 review rounds), and explicit triggers — with only minor gaps from its policy (non-code) form. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear section-based workflow (开工 → 硬门槛 → 验证范围 → 收尾) with explicit validation checkpoints ("先有能自证等价的验证，再动代码"), a red→green feedback loop, and a hard-gate checklist; the only gap is policy-style rather than crisp numbered sequencing. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section headers are well organized, but the skill is a long monolithic SKILL.md with no bundle files or references, and the elaborate 审查协议 and 持续学习 sections are content that could plausibly live in separate reference files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |