Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is highly actionable with concrete templates, a well-sequenced workflow, and strong validation checkpoints. Its main weaknesses are cross-section redundancy that hurts conciseness and a monolithic structure that underuses progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the single-target rule and sibling-skill boundaries, which recur in 启动必读, Spec, 适用场景, 硬性边界, and 常见错误 — state once and reference.
Move 常见错误 and 和其他工作流的关系 into a separate reference file (one level deep) to shrink SKILL.md and improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is information-dense and assumes competence without explaining basics, but several concepts (single-target rule, non-use cases, sibling-skill relationships) are restated across 启动必读, Spec, 适用场景, 硬性边界, and 常见错误, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready templates (frontmatter YAML, body section skeleton, 变更日志), exact file paths (requirements/{slug}.md, VISION.md), specific commands (grep -r, git log), and a逐条 self-check checklist — fully actionable for an instruction-only skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Phase 1–6 is a clear sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (Phase 4 自查清单, Phase 5 用户 review, Phase 6 落盘), a 退出条件 checklist, and a Spec encoding HumanCheckpoint/NeedsHuman feedback loops, matching the top anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and external references (shared-conventions.md, requirement-example.md) are clearly signaled with paths, but the ~300-line SKILL.md is monolithic with no bundle files splitting content (e.g., 常见错误, 和其他工作流的关系) that could live one level deep. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |