Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured delegation contract with a clear sequenced workflow and an explicit failure checkpoint. Its only real gap is that the mechanism for loading the target skill is stated directionally rather than as an executable instruction.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and purposeful: every line (entry intent, four execution rules, three maintenance rules) carries an instruction with no padding or re-explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the level-3 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The execution rules give concrete directional guidance (load cs-epic, continue with requested_stage: planning, do not require re-invocation), but the actual mechanism for 'load cs-epic by installed skill name' is left implicit with no executable command or specific instruction, matching the level-2 'some concrete guidance but incomplete' anchor rather than fully copy-paste-ready. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence is given and step 4 is an explicit failure checkpoint ('如果当前运行时无法加载主入口协议，停止并报告'), providing the error-recovery feedback loop the level-3 anchor rewards. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, owns no bundle files (references/scripts/assets absent), and is organized into well-signaled sections (执行规则, 维护规则), which the simple-skills scoring note permits to score 3 without external file references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |