Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, actionable, and well-sequenced with validation checkpoints, scoring strongly on the first three dimensions. Its one real defect is that the three referenced detail files (RULES.md, INTERVIEW.md, IMPLEMENTATION.md) are missing from the bundle, so progressive disclosure is only partially realized.
Suggestions
Add the missing bundle files RULES.md, INTERVIEW.md, and IMPLEMENTATION.md so the body's one-level-deep references resolve.
If those files are intentionally absent, inline the minimal content each link promises (full rules, the Q1–Q9 interview, install/theme/composition code) rather than leaving dead links.
Verify referenced paths match actual filenames before publishing, since broken references cap the progressive-disclosure score.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body that assumes competence — no padding explaining what a topbar or library is; every section (hook JSON, pre-flight reads, checklist) earns its tokens. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance: exact files to read (package.json, src/App.tsx, app.config.ts), a complete .cursor/hooks.json block, and a precise compliance checklist with concrete values like darkMode: 'class' and the right-strip order. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Step 0–6 sequence with a pre-flight inference checkpoint ('State what was inferred') and an explicit compliance checklist as the validation gate, plus a failure branch for installation problems. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Body is a well-signaled overview pointing one level deep to RULES.md, INTERVIEW.md, and IMPLEMENTATION.md, but those referenced bundle files do not exist on disk, so the navigation is broken. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |