Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable review methodology with a clear sequenced workflow, explicit conditional gating, and concrete props/heuristics to check. Its main weakness is conciseness: the central 'read the official doc, don't guess' directive is repeated far more than necessary across every section.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated 'load docs via cds-docs / don't guess ARIA / keep web and RN separate' directive into a single stated-once rule in Doc discipline, then reference it instead of restating it in every Part 1 step, Part 2 subsection, and Anti-pattern.
Move the Common props mental-map table and the Anti-patterns list into a references/ file (e.g. references/quick-checks.md) and link to it from Part 3, reducing the inline SKILL.md footprint and sharpening progressive disclosure.
In Part 1, collapse Steps 3 and 4's overlapping component-choice guidance into a single step with a decision checklist, since both currently restate 'smallest component whose doc covers the interaction'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Accurate and free of basic-concept filler, but the core directive (load docs via cds-docs, don't guess ARIA, keep web/RN separate) is restated dozens of times across When-to-use, Prerequisites, Success criteria, every Part 1 step, Part 2, and Anti-patterns; the pervasive redundancy could be cut substantially without losing meaning, so it sits below the 'minor instances' bar of a 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Names exact props to verify (accessibilityLabel, accessibilityHint, accessibilityState, accessibilityRole, as, role, aria-*, htmlFor) and gives concrete heuristics ('smallest component whose doc fully covers the interaction') plus a mental-map table; for an instruction-only review skill the guidance is actionable, though the actual prop tables are delegated to the external cds-docs skill. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Part 1 is a clearly sequenced Setup + Steps 1-7 workflow with explicit conditional gating (Step 5 only for focus-managed components, with skip logic) and verification/checklist steps (Step 6 Verify, Step 7 final checklist tied to Success criteria); some checkpoints are 'note that...' acknowledgements rather than hard gates, keeping it just short of a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections (When to use, Prerequisites, Success criteria, Part 1/2/3) with one-level-deep, clearly signaled links to the cds-docs and cds-code skills; no bundle files exist so everything is inlined in ~210 lines, and the Part 2 patterns partially restate Part 1, which is a minor organization gap rather than a structural problem. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |