Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured orchestrator prompt that tells Claude exactly what to do and, importantly, what not to do, with a clear launch-wait-report sequence and strong failure guardrails. It is concise and actionable, with only minor room to add an explicit example launch and a verification step before reporting.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is compact and assumes Claude's competence, using terse imperative directives with no padding about what agents or worktrees are; the only minor excess is the repeated 'Do NOT' list, which could be tightened slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, executable guidance — 'Launch the rulecheck-agent with the focus area: $ARGUMENTS', 'Wait for it to complete', 'Report ONLY what the agent told you' — with specific instructions; the small gap is the lack of an exact launch command/example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence (launch → wait → report) with explicit guardrails for failure/context-limit cases; it stops short of a 5 because there is no explicit validation checkpoint the orchestrator performs on the agent's output before reporting. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a short, single-purpose orchestrator skill with no bundle files and a well-organized two-section structure (Your Job / Rules for You); per the simple-skkill note, that is appropriately structured and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |