Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-organized body with executable gh commands and a clear process, held back slightly by a verbose output template and the absence of a validation checkpoint in a batch labeling workflow.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation step for batch labeling, e.g. re-fetch each issue's labels after editing and verify the applied categories, retrying on gh command failure.
Trim the two-table summary template to the essential fields to reduce token cost.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with no concept over-explanation, but the two-table summary template and the dynamic context block add tokens that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides real, executable gh commands (label list, issue view, issue edit --add-label) plus a concrete output template, which is copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered process is clearly sequenced with good decision logic, but this batch labeling operation has no explicit validation/feedback loop, capping the score at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the single-task skill is well-organized into clear sections (Scope, Process, Rules) with no nested references, which satisfies the simple-skill guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |