Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality orchestration skill: an unambiguous gated workflow with explicit validation and stop conditions, entirely copy-paste-ready commands, and dense project-specific knowledge with no filler. The two deductions are minor: some nested case-law prose could be tightened, and the deepest operational recipes (worktree/socat bridging, skip-check edge cases) are inlined in SKILL.md rather than split into a reference file.
Suggestions
Extract the worktree/socat backend-bridging recipe (Phase 2, lines 160-173) into a references/local-run-gate.md file and keep a one-line trigger in SKILL.md ('FE-from-source against a prebuilt backend: see references/local-run-gate.md') — it is deep troubleshooting detail only needed in an uncommon stack configuration.
Restructure the Skip-check paragraph (lines 117-135) as a short decision table (change type → cover/skip action) instead of nested parenthetical case analysis; the current prose requires multiple re-reads to extract the decision rule.
Similarly consider moving the three 'false or unbuildable test' piloting lessons (lines 88-108) to a reference file, keeping the one-line rule of each inline — SKILL.md would then read as a lean overview with detail one level deep.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section carries project-specific earned knowledge (port proxies, worktree port-hashing, tag_lint as a CI gate) rather than concepts Claude already knows — git/docker/Playwright mechanics are used, never taught. It sits at the 4 anchor ("efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed") rather than 5 because the nested case-law prose in the Skip-check paragraph (lines 117-135) and the socat worktree gotcha are denser than needed and could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands throughout: the four git diff variants, `curl <baseUrl>/api/is-alive/ver`, the complete `docker run -d ... alpine/socat ...` bridge with the `VITE_DEV_PORT=5174` start line, `tag_lint.py` invocation, `npx playwright test tests/<area>/ --reporter=list` and `npx tsc --noEmit`. Matches the 5 anchor ("copy-paste ready code or commands"); 4 would require gaps in coverage of the common cases, and there are none. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four explicitly gated phases with a digraph of the loop, hard validation checkpoints (tag_lint `0 problem(s)`, green run, tsc clean, taxonomy updated), explicit stop conditions ("If all four are empty... say so and stop"; skip-with-a-note rules), and feedback routing ("QA owns this skill... the fix lands in this skill's files"). This is the 5 anchor — clear sequence, explicit validation, error-recovery guidance — not 4, which allows missing checkpoints. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned (phases, headers, tables) and demonstrates a genuine one-level-deep deferral — "Don't restate them here; read `.agents/skills/writing-e2e-tests/conventions.md` if you need them" — instead of duplicating another skill's conventions. No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent), so everything lives in SKILL.md; the ~15-line worktree/socat bridging recipe and the skip-check case analysis are inlined detail that would fit a reference file. That places it at the 4 anchor ("good structure; most content appropriately placed; minor organization gaps") rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |