Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable body with clear gated sequencing and concrete commands, but slightly verbose in places and its cross-file references (test-plan-template.md, release-gate-contract.md) lack backing bundle files.
Suggestions
Provide the referenced bundle files (test-plan-template.md, release-gate-contract.md) under references/ so the signaled one-level-deep pointers actually resolve.
Tighten the Phase 1 skip-check prose and worktree/socat gotchas into a separate reference or a compact checklist to reduce token weight without dropping the executable commands.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and competence-assuming with no padding of known concepts, but the ~220-line body has discursive prose (Phase 1 skip-check rationale, piloting lessons, worktree/socat gotchas) that could be tightened without losing the load-bearing commands. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready commands throughout — 'git merge-base origin/main HEAD', 'git show origin/main:version.txt', 'curl <baseUrl>/api/is-alive/ver', the socat 'docker run' bridge, 'npm run test:release-gate' — fully executable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Five numbered phases with two explicit pre-authoring gates ('Two gates here, before expensive authoring') and validation checkpoints (scope-gate yes/no, local-run stack check, confirm green), plus re-validate feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections and signals to 'read test-plan-template.md' and 'release-gate-contract.md' and the writing-e2e-tests skill, but the references/, scripts/, and assets/ bundle dirs are empty so these one-level-deep pointers don't resolve to actual files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |