Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-sequenced instruction-only skill that assumes competence and embeds verification checkpoints. Adding an example invocation/manifest and an explicit confidence-feedback loop would lift actionability and workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Include one concrete example command or minimal input-manifest snippet so the run step is copy-paste ready.
Add an explicit feedback loop for low-confidence results (e.g. when interface/ligand confidence is weak, regenerate with adjusted seeds/constraints and re-score).
Clarify where Boltz package/version and command are recorded by referencing a concrete manifest filename or artifact path.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: no padding, no explanation of what Boltz is, and every line gives actionable guidance within roughly a dozen lines. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Each workflow step gives concrete, specific direction (entity types to normalize, execution routes to verify, fields to preserve, artifact categories to save), but no example command or manifest snippet is provided for a tool-running skill. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 5-step workflow with validation checkpoints (verify execution route in step 2; treat output as hypothesis with verification checks in the closing paragraph), though it lacks an explicit failure-feedback loop for re-running on low confidence. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | As a short, single-purpose skill with no bundle files and no need for external references, the well-organized numbered workflow satisfies the simple-skill exception for full marks. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |