Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured instruction skill with concrete paths, an explicit verification step, and no padding. The main gap is the absence of specific commands and an explicit retry loop when verification fails.
Suggestions
Add the concrete invocation for 'Pi command discovery' (e.g., the actual command) so step 4 is copy-paste executable.
Extend step 4 into a feedback loop: state what to do when verification fails (fix and re-verify before recording).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~15-line body is lean, assumes Claude's competence, explains no basic concepts, and every line (paths, decision rule, verification, closing principle) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete file paths (`.feynman/agents/`, `skills/`, `.feynman/workbench/settings.json`) and a clear decision procedure make the guidance mostly executable, but no specific commands are given and 'Pi command discovery' is named without an invocation example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 5-step workflow includes an explicit validation checkpoint in step 4, but lacks a feedback loop describing what to do when verification fails. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | As a single-purpose skill under 50 lines needing no external references, the well-organized heading-plus-numbered-workflow-plus-principle structure meets the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |