Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An efficient, well-sequenced instruction-only skill whose body assumes Claude's intelligence and bakes an explicit inspect-and-revise validation loop into the workflow. The only real gap is the absence of executable examples and concrete output-format specifics in the final save step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean ~12-line workflow with no concept over-explanation or padding; every line carries an instruction, fully assuming Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps give concrete, actionable guidance (panel plan with labels, chart types, data sources, annotations; a specific inspect-checklist), but there are no executable code/command examples and step 5 omits format/location details for the saved artifacts. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with an explicit validation/inspection step ("Render, inspect, and revise for label collisions, axis readability, color meaning, caption fit, and data-source fidelity") that serves as a feedback loop with a built-in checklist; the simple-skill exception applies and there is no destructive/batch cap. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, and well-organized with no need for external reference files (the `figure-style` reference is to another skill, not a bundle file), so the simple-skill exception yields a top score for clean in-line organization. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |