CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

literature-review

Run a literature review using paper search and primary-source synthesis. Use when the user asks for a lit review, paper survey, state of the art, or academic landscape summary on a research topic.

68

Quality

82%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, well-structured pointer skill that delegates execution to the /lit workflow while staying token-efficient. Its main limitation is that almost all substantive workflow detail lives outside the body.

Suggestions

Add one or two explicit validation/verification checkpoints or a brief expected-output shape so the body's workflow clarity does not depend entirely on the delegated /lit workflow.

Optionally include a minimal example of the output structure or provenance sidecar format to strengthen actionability without sacrificing conciseness.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and efficient: three short labeled sections with no concept over-explanation, and the anti-footgun note about the slash command earns its tokens by preventing a real misuse.

5 / 5

Actionability

Provides a concrete executable command ('Run the `/lit` workflow') and specifies output location and sidecar, but delegates all substantive guidance to the /lit workflow, leaving minor gaps in what the body itself instructs.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The single delegating action is unambiguous and the agent roster (researcher, verifier, reviewer) signals an embedded verification loop, but the body does not itself sequence steps or state explicit checkpoints.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A short, single-purpose skill with no bundle files; the body is well-organized into clear labeled sections (instruction, agents, output) with no nested references, satisfying the simple-skill exception.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that clearly states both capability and triggers with natural phrasing. It is slightly general in the actions it enumerates and could add a few more review-type synonyms.

Suggestions

Add 1-2 more concrete actions (e.g., 'summarize findings', 'cite primary sources') to lift specificity toward comprehensive coverage.

Include additional natural trigger synonyms such as 'systematic review', 'scoping review', or 'research survey' to broaden trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('literature review') and two concrete actions ('paper search', 'primary-source synthesis'), but coverage is limited and the actions are stated at a fairly general level rather than enumerating multiple specific operations.

3 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Run a literature review using paper search and primary-source synthesis') and when ('Use when the user asks for a lit review, paper survey, state of the art, or academic landscape summary') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes several natural phrases users would say ('lit review', 'paper survey', 'state of the art', 'academic landscape summary') plus the synonym 'literature review', but omits common variants like 'systematic review' or 'scoping review'.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear academic-synthesis niche with distinct triggers, with only minor overlap risk against general research or web-search skills.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
companion-inc/feynman
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.