Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured overview with concrete commands and a clear availability/fallback branch. Slight headroom remains on actionability (placeholders) and on making the fallback workflow's verification of success more explicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient: a one-paragraph rule, a compact command table, and a handful of fallback commands, with no padding or re-explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, mostly executable commands (the /preview command table and pandoc/open fallbacks), but placeholders like '<file.md>' and 'when available' hedges leave minor gaps versus fully copy-paste-ready examples. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear two-branch decision (use /preview when visible, else fall back to shell/browser tools and report the package is not installed); no destructive or batch operation, so the validation cap does not apply, but explicit checkpoints beyond the report step are absent. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references, and content is organized into well-labeled sections (# Preview, ## Commands, ## Fallback), satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |