CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

frontend-design

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

61

Quality

71%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./frontend-design/skills/frontend-design/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

57%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-organized, single-purpose aesthetic-guidance skill that appropriately stays self-contained, scoring well on structure. It is held back by motivational padding, lack of any executable example, and absence of validation checkpoints in its build-then-apply workflow.

Suggestions

Trim motivational filler (e.g. "There are so many flavors to choose from" and the closing "Don't hold back..." paragraph) to tighten conciseness toward a leaner token budget.

Add at least one concrete, copy-paste-ready snippet (e.g. a CSS-variables theme block or a staggered animation-delay example) to lift actionability beyond named-technique directives.

Add a lightweight verification step to the workflow (e.g. "re-read the output against the chosen tone and the avoid-list before finalizing") so the build-then-apply sequence has an explicit checkpoint.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Most of the body is skill-specific actionable guidance, but it carries motivational padding ("There are so many flavors to choose from", the closing "Don't hold back, show what can truly be created...") that could be trimmed — efficient but not lean enough for a 3.

2 / 3

Actionability

It names concrete techniques and libraries (CSS variables, Motion library, animation-delay, gradient meshes, noise textures) but provides no executable code/template and leans on subjective directives ("beautiful, unique, and interesting", "memorable"), so guidance is concrete yet incomplete.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A sequence exists (Design Thinking → commit to a direction → implement → apply Aesthetics Guidelines), but there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops, placing it at steps-listed-but-checkpoints-missing rather than the explicit-validation score-3 anchor.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines, self-contained with no bundle files and no need for external references, and well-organized into clear sections (Design Thinking, Frontend Aesthetics Guidelines with bolded sub-points), meeting the simple-skill allowance for a 3.

3 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: it states concrete capabilities and an explicit Use-when trigger with a distinctive design-quality niche. Its main weakness is trigger-term breadth, covering only build/component/page/application phrasing while omitting common frontend synonyms.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names multiple specific concrete actions — "Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces", "build web components, pages, or applications", "Generates creative, polished code" — matching the multiple-concrete-actions anchor rather than the single-domain score-2 anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what ("Create...frontend interfaces", "Generates...code") and when ("Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications"), matching the explicit-trigger score-3 anchor and clearly above the score-2 case where 'when' is only implied.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

"Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications" supplies some natural terms but misses common variations users would say ("UI", "frontend", "landing page", "dashboard", "design"), so it lands at the some-keywords-but-incomplete level rather than full coverage.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The high-design framing ("distinctive, production-grade", "avoids generic AI aesthetics") carves a clear frontend-design niche with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills; not the score-2 overlap case despite 'applications' being broad.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
composio-community/awesome-claude-plugins
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.