Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary procedural skill: concrete commands at every step, a clearly sequenced workflow with explicit validation checkpoints and approval gates for risky operations, and no filler. The only refinement opportunity is moving the 8-section PR body template into a reference file to slim the main body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient — exact commands, no re-teaching of concepts Claude knows — but the ~50-line inlined PR-body template carries inline coaching commentary (e.g., "Aim for what a reviewer would draw on a whiteboard") that adds minor bulk; anchor 5 demands every token earn its place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout: `gh auth status` prerequisite check, exact parallel git probes, a complete `gh pr create` heredoc invocation, and the `--base` edge case — copy-paste ready with the common cases covered. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A 7-step numbered workflow with a prerequisite check, approval gates before any commit/push, and an explicit pre-submit checklist with a fix-before-submit feedback loop — matching the anchor for clear sequence with validation and error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good single-file structure with clear section headers and no nested references, but the large PR-body template is inlined in a 157-line body rather than split into a one-level reference file; anchor 5 expects content appropriately split across files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |